Home
Blog
Recent prosecutions – worker loses fingers to unguarded machinery
2
min read

Recent prosecutions – worker loses fingers to unguarded machinery

Published on

April 6, 2023

Ian Hatherly
Director
Ian Hatherly
Table of Contents
Speak with an Opus Safety expert
Get in touch

A manufacturing company has been fined more than £66,000 following an accident involving unguarded machinery. An employee lost portions of two fingers after getting his hand caught in a machine used to produce face masks. The worker attempted to fix the mechanism after noticing the material was not correctly feeding into it. With the machine still running, his hand was caught and most of his little finger and ring finger were ripped off.

A Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation found that his employer failed to provide suitable guarding around its machines. The company also failed to undertake a risk assessment before the machines were used.

Reduce machine-related hazards at your builders merchant

  • Keep machinery fit for purpose with a routine maintenance schedule and stringent pre-use checks.
  • Train staff on machinery use and supplement their knowledge with regular refresher training.
  • Include machinery and guards in your risk assessment process.
  • Make it clear that removing or overriding guards is strictly forbidden.
  • Display safety signage to alert workers to machinery hazards.
  • Ensure staff know how to use emergency stop controls.
  • Train workers on what to do in the event of an accident.
Ian Hatherly
Director
Ian Hatherly

Last updated

April 6, 2023

Why businesses choose
Opus Safety
Get in touch
Blog

Health & safety insights

Guidance, updates and practical advice for your sector.

Two factory workers in blue jackets working at a production line with overhead tooling
A laptop showing an online report form on a desk, beside a clipboard, a pen and a folded hi-vis vest
Recent prosecutions: Warehouse worker loses both legs in forklift truck incident
Training, checks, and a strong safety culture - how to stamp out unguarded machinery risks
Recent prosecutions – employee seriously injured by unguarded machinery
Eye on the industry - company fined after unguarded machinery accident
Blog

PUWER and machinery guarding: the duty holder's guide

PUWER is the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998. Who the duty holder is, what regulation 11 requires for guarding, and the records to keep.

Blog

RIDDOR meaning: what is reportable, and what is not

RIDDOR stands for the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013. What you must report, by when, and what is excluded.

Blog

Training, checks, and a strong safety culture - how to stamp out unguarded machinery risks

A five-figure penalty has put machine guard safety back in the HSE spotlight. Cut your risks with regular training and simple tech-led checks.

Blog

Recent prosecutions: Warehouse worker loses both legs in forklift truck incident

A haulage firm’s forklift truck practices have cost an employee the use of his legs. Learn the simple safety measures that could have protected him.

Blog

Eye on the industry - company fined after unguarded machinery accident

A soft furnishings company was fined £13,600 and ordered to pay costs of £17,260 after an employee suffered severe hand injuries.

Blog

Recent prosecutions – employee seriously injured by unguarded machinery

An export services company was slapped with a £21,000 fine following an unguarded machinery accident.

Checkmark Icon
BMF Preferred Supplier
Ex-Regulators (HSE / Local Authority)

Why businesses choose
‍Opus Safety

We've worked across UK industry for years. The numbers show what our clients achieve when compliance becomes a strength, not a burden.